Before putting forward my opinion of who committed the Whitechapel murders, and detailing the evidence to support this, I feel it is important to decide which of the murders were committed by Jack The Ripper, and which were committed by other felons.
I do not believe that 'Fairy Fay' ever existed, and should really be discounted by any serious researcher. Of subsequent victims, I feel that Emma Smith was probably murdered by a gang from the Old Nichol, and that Mylett, McKenzie, Coles and the Pinchin Street Torso can be ruled out of our investigations.
Of the remaining victims I believe that Tabram, Nichols, Chapman, Eddowes and Kelly were victims of Jack The Ripper, and that Stride was killed by another well known Ripper suspect. I therefore have two suspects, one who killed ONLY Stride, and another who killed the other five.
If we first consider the Witness, we know that he was "the only person who ever had a good view of the murderer". Three names are generally suggested as the Witness- Lawende, Levy and Schwartz. The first two undoubtedly saw Eddowes assailant talking to her, whilst the third actually saw the start of the assault on Stride.
Lawende did furnish a good description of the mans clothing, but "did not think that he would recognise the man if he saw him again"(A to Z page 250), whilst Levy "could furnish no description of either of them"(First American Serial Killer page 78). Therefore, the only person to have a clear view, and to be accepted by the police was Israel Schwartz, who saw the end of Liz Stride. Therefore, Schwartz is probably Andersons Witness, and therefore Andersons Suspect was only responsible for ONE murder, and not for the other five. I say only one, as most researchers now agree that the MO in Strides killing is different enough to agree that Stride's killer did not kill the others.
Swanson identified the suspect as one Aaron Kosminski, and although the names of Kaminsky and Cohen have been added over the years by modern researchers, Kosminski is the more probable. Swanson claimed that the witness identified Kosminski, but did not want to be responsible for his execution, because he was also a Jew.
The police were said to have been impressed by Schwartz's straight-forwardness and truthfulness, and he is almost certainly Anderson's Witness, and Kosminski was the Suspect and responsible for killing Stride only.
Stride should be discounted as a "canonical victim" because the MO is so different in her murder compared to the other killings. It does seem that Stride is only considered to have been a victim because the police and press assumed that her attacker was interrupted by the approach of Diemschutz, and went on to find and murder Eddowes. Apart from the 'Saucy Jack' letter (which is clearly a fake), there is really nothing to suggest that Stride was a victim of Jack The Ripper.
Martha Tabram is an entirely different prospect. Many people have dismissed her case, feeling that she was killed by her soldier client, however most researchers concur with the weighty opinions of Abberline and Anderson who later believed that she was the first true victim.
Tabram was last seen with her soldier client at 1145pm, and her body was seen at approximately 330am, obviously leaving her enough time to find a new client after leaving the soldier. The soldier who went with Pearly Poll was seen by a policeman at 130am, saying that he was waiting for his friend, obviously having agreed a set time to meet up. It is unlikely that the soldiers, two friends, would agree a set time, and then be two hours late.
As John Ogan points out, it was not suspected for long that a bayonet was the murder weapon, and that doctors of the time accepted that even a pen knife could have been used. Although her throat was not cut, the fact that the private parts were the prime target suggests that she was the first victim of Jack the Ripper.
Furthermore, if we take the victims as being:
Tabram-->Nichols-->Chapman-->Eddowes-->Kelly
we can see an undoubted increase in mutliations, backing up the belief that the killer suffered from a failing mind.
Of the remaining victims, Nichols, Chapman and Eddowes are universally accepted as victims, and really need no further discussion.
There has been some debate as to whether or not Kelly was a true Ripper victim, or victim of a copycat killing. Bruce Paley has suggested that she may have been killed by Joseph Barnett, as the MO is so different (i.e. killed in doors). However the police interviewed Barnett for four hours, and were entirely satisfied with his story. We can therefore assume that he had a solid alibi. Also, Julia Van Turney had stated that Barnett was kind to Kelly and kept her well, and he simply does not fit the pattern of a psychopath.
Although the MO is different, surely it was inevitable that Jack the Ripper would eventually move off the police-infested streets and kill in a prostitutes dwelling, where he could not be seen or interrupted. The drawing of Millers Court is well known to have been incorrect, and the killer would have bolted Kelly's door by reaching through the broken window pane- i.e the killer did not need a door key.
The style of mutliations are more severe, but not really that different to Eddowes. They are still in the style of Masonic ritualism (circular removal of breasts, heart torn out), and the missing heart falls into line with the missing kidneys, uterii etc from the other victims.
There has been a suggestion that the Millers Court Victim was not actually Kelly, but another prostitute, and that the extensive face mutliation made it impossible to confirm the identity. This 'theory' suggested that Kelly had been in some sort of trouble, and that another prostitute was killed, made to look like a Ripper victim, and that Kelly then fled the country to America, everyone believing that she was dead! This is apparently supported by the fact that there were some clothes in the fireplace, supposedly the remnants of the prostitutes clothing. This theory is absolute rubbish. I believe that Kelly was the victim, and was killed by Jack The Ripper.Francis J Tumblety was a well known suspect in 1888, but somehow his existence was missed by researchers until the surfacing of the Littlechild Letter.
As with all of the suspects, there is no concrete evidence pointing to Tumblety, but the plethora of circumstancial evidence, as well as the Letter and opinion of such a high-ranking Officer make Tumblety the most plausable new suspect since the discovery of the Macnaughten memorandum. Many people have dismissed Tumblety becuase there are a number of glaring problems in the Evans/Gainey book (otherwise a very good read), although I feel that I have a good argument for him being the killer.
Tumblety is often rejected because many researchers have the impression that he was in jail at the time of Kelly's death. This is NOT true. He was arrested on 7th November on a gross indecency charge, a misdemeanour which means he would have been granted police bail until the time of the next magistsrates sitting (16th). He was therefore on the streets from 7th until he was re-arrested on 14th, and re-bailed on the 16th. He was therefore around at the time of the Millers Court glut.
He then fled to the USA via France, under an alias. "Why did the police only send one man to catch the Ripper?"I hear you cry, immediately writing him off. In fact, Inspector Walters had the assistance of "half a dozen English Detectives and two clerks"(A to Z page 30). If Tumblety was only on an indecency charge, the police would not have pursued him. They obviously suspected him of far worse.
Tumblety was also an Irish-American Fenian, and possibly part of a plan to assassinate Balfour. It is also believed that he had a role in the murder of two members of the Irish Office (whose names I forget), who were stabbed to death in a park by a man matching the description of a certain American doctor.
There are numerous things pointing to Tumblety, apart from his possibly being the Batty Street Lodger. The most enticing point is that an inventory of personal belongings was taking on his death, and as well as some extremely expensive jewellry , $1000 in bonds and over $430 in cash, he also had TWO CHEAP IMITATION RINGS value $2-3, exactly the same as those missing from Annie Chapman! A serial killer's trophy?
Tumblety was known to the police, was probably the infamous Batty Street lodger and was pursued to America. There was also a "large dossier on him at Scotland Yard" according to Littlechild, which has unfortunately been lost.
His character points to him being Jack The Ripper.
I have mentioned that I believe that the Liverpool Letters were the only real letters, as I think that where it says "I shall be at work in the Minories on 1st and 2nd inst", it does not mean on the first and 2nd of this month, but within the next 1 and 2 days. As we know, the letters were sent from Liverpool on 29th and Eddowes was killed on the 30th, therefore matching the date on the letter.
I believe that the victims/killers were as follows:
Fairy Fay did not exist Emma Smith an Old Nichols Gang Martha Tabram Francis J Tumblety Polly Nichols Francis J Tumblety Annie Chapman Francis J Tumblety Lizzie Stride Aaron Kosminski Catherine Eddowes Francis J Tumblety Mary Jane Kelly Francis J Tumblety
I would welcome any comments
Scott Hannaford
