Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Maybrick, James: The Diary — Old Hoax or New or Not a Hoax at All?​ - by Tani 46 minutes ago.
Victims: How Many Victims? - by Fiver 50 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: When Did "One Off" Take Off? - by Sam Flynn 55 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Lack of equal justice as motive - by Tani 1 hour ago.
Victims: How Many Victims? - by Tani 1 hour ago.
Maybrick, James: When Did "One Off" Take Off? - by Lombro2 3 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: google ngrams - by Iconoclast 3 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: MJK3 image origin speculation - by Tani 3 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Lets get Lechmere off the hook! - (26 posts)
Doctors and Coroners: The kidney removal of Catherine Eddowes. - (23 posts)
Maybrick, James: The Diary — Old Hoax or New or Not a Hoax at All?​ - (15 posts)
General Discussion: Local Knowledge - (7 posts)
Maybrick, James: When Did "One Off" Take Off? - (5 posts)
Visual Media: Calls for Jack the Ripper inquest after DNA breakthrough (UK) 17/Jan/2025 - (5 posts)


The Times (London)
4 February 1891

At LAMBETH, Edwin Colocitt, 24, living in Aldebert-road, was charged on remand with stabbing several females in the neighbourhoods of Clapham and Brixton. Mr. Sims prosecuted for the Treasury; and Mr. W.H. Armstrong defended. Some facts of the case have already been reported. It was alleged that several females had been jostled by the prisoner at night, and they afterwards found that they had been stabbed with some sharp instrument. Several of the injured females declared that to the best of their belief the prisoner was the man who had assaulted them in the way described. Dr. Dorin, of Clapham-road, said he had examined three of the females and found them wounded, evidently with some sharp instrument, which had gone right through the clothing. Mr. Armstrong urged that it was a case of mistaken identity. Mr. Hopkins said he should not deal with the case, but committed the prisoner to take his trial at the Sessions, admitting him to bail as before.


Related pages:
  Edwin Colocitt
       Official Documents: The Macnaghten Memoranda 
       Press Reports: Centralia Enterprise and Tribune - 14 March 1891 
       Press Reports: Times - 21 April 1891 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 19 March 1891 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 21 February 1891 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 21 March 1891