Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
General Suspect Discussion: The Missing Evidence II - New Ripper Documentary - Aug 2024 - by Paddy Goose 3 hours ago.
Dear Boss Letter: Are There Good Arguments Against Bullen/ing? - by Tani 4 hours ago.
General Discussion: Sugden's Book - by Wickerman 5 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: The Missing Evidence II - New Ripper Documentary - Aug 2024 - by Lewis C 5 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Why Cross Was Almost Certainly Innocent - by Lewis C 5 hours ago.
General Discussion: Sugden's Book - by Lewis C 6 hours ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Bucks Row Scenarios - by Elamarna 6 hours ago.
Books: Bad Books? - by Lewis C 6 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - (30 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Why Cross Was Almost Certainly Innocent - (21 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: The Missing Evidence II - New Ripper Documentary - Aug 2024 - (20 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: Bucks Row Scenarios - (16 posts)
General Discussion: Sugden's Book - (10 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: Millers Court - Was it Cleaned? - (7 posts)


Times (London)
4 May 1889

THE TRIAL OF DIEMHOLZ.

Mr. C. GRAHAM asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, at the recent trial of Diemholz and Kozebrodski, Mr. Gill, who appeared for the Home Office, obtained any assent on behalf of the accused to their pleading guilty of a technical assault; and whether during the trial of Diemholz his wife was refused admittance to the Court on the plea of want of space.

Mr. MATTHEWS.-The answer to the first paragraph is in the negative. There was no plea of guilty and no consent to a plea. The constable on duty in the Court remembers a woman, who said she was a witness in the case, but did not give her name, asking to be allowed to enter the Court, and he told her, in conformity with a standing order of the Bench as to witnesses, that she could not enter until her name was called. He did not know that she was the wife of the defendant.


Related pages:
  Isaac Kozebrodsky
       Press Reports: Daily News - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Evening News - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: London Evening News - 1 October 1888 
  Louis Diemschutz
       Press Reports: East London Advertiser - 27 April 1889 
       Press Reports: Morning Advertiser - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 19 March 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 2 May 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 2 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 21 March 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 26 April 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 9 April 1889