Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Pub Talk: Has Anyone Been Watching the Mayfair Witches Series on TV? - by c.d. 22 minutes ago.
General Discussion: Summing Up And Verdict - by kjab3112 1 hour ago.
Pub Talk: King Charles Opens Canadian Parliament - by Enigma 1 hour ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Did The Ripper Remove Organs? - by Trevor Marriott 2 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: The Diary—Old Hoax or New? - by John Wheat 2 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Did The Ripper Remove Organs? - by Herlock Sholmes 3 hours ago.
Pub Talk: King Charles Opens Canadian Parliament - by C. F. Leon 4 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Did The Ripper Remove Organs? - by Trevor Marriott 4 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Bury, W.H.: Is Bury the best suspect we have? - (35 posts)
Motive, Method and Madness: Did The Ripper Remove Organs? - (31 posts)
General Discussion: Summing Up And Verdict - (11 posts)
Motive, Method and Madness: Catherine Eddowes' Kidney - (9 posts)
Maybrick, James: The Diary—Old Hoax or New? - (7 posts)
Research Related: The Complete Jack the Ripper, Donald Rumbelow - (6 posts)


The Two Republics
Mexico

27 December 1888

The Society of Medical Jurisprudence of New York City discussed recently the Whitechapel London murders and concluded that the murderer is of sound mind. Lawyer Austin Abbot read a paper which set forth that there are barbarous instincts in man preserved with remarkable persistence by the laws of heredity, from uncivilized ancestry. "The crime shows", said Mr. Abbott, "a hand accustomed to rapid work, to expert celerity. Now, these qualities imply a considerable mental development on the part of the murderer. The chief source of error in the investigation of lunacy is the tendency of medical experts to infer disease from the nature of the crime itself." An account of the discussion adds: Dr. Stitzka multiplied instances of horrible crimes of the Whitechapel variety, come of them committed by the Roman Emperors, some in the present century. In all of them he observed one element plainly marked - sexual perversion. Medical authority, he said, has not been accustomed to men like Jack the Ripper, insane. He recalled the strange Texas murders of two years ago, and suggested that the mysterious Texan and Jack are one and the same. "He may begin his operations in some other city before long," he declared. "The nine London crimes show too much good practice. This barbarous element is present in greater or less degree in every one of us. It is well known that criminals frequently haunt the places where their deeds are discussed, so it is within the bounds of possibility that the Whitechapel murderer is now present in this room."