Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Why Cross Was Almost Certainly Innocent - by Geddy2112 52 minutes ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Bucks Row - The Other Side of the Coin. - by Geddy2112 1 hour ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Bucks Row - The Other Side of the Coin. - by Geddy2112 1 hour ago.
Pub Talk: App That Warns Loved Ones if You Watch Porn a Hit with Christian Right in the US - by Herlock Sholmes 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Why Cross Was Almost Certainly Innocent - by Herlock Sholmes 1 hour ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Bucks Row - The Other Side of the Coin. - by John Wheat 1 hour ago.
Pub Talk: App That Warns Loved Ones if You Watch Porn a Hit with Christian Right in the US - by FISHY1118 1 hour ago.
Pub Talk: App That Warns Loved Ones if You Watch Porn a Hit with Christian Right in the US - by caz 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - (20 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: Bucks Row Scenarios - (17 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Why Cross Was Almost Certainly Innocent - (15 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - (12 posts)
General Discussion: Sugden's Book - (9 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: The Missing Evidence II - New Ripper Documentary - Aug 2024 - (7 posts)


Times (London)
6 November 1889

THOMAS PITMAN, who was described as a barman, was re-examined on the charge of breaking and entering the dwelling-house at 36, Ingersole-road, Uxbridge-road. In {sic} appeared that on the afternoon of the day in question Mr. W.O. Bartlett, the son of the occupier, was alone in the house lying on the bed when he heard the striking of a match downstairs. He went to the landing and saw a man coming up. He called out, "Who's there?" The man ran out followed by Mr. Bartlett, who spoke to a constable. The prisoner was seen running with another man, who escaped. The prisoner stopped, took off his overcoat, and returned carrying it on his arm. He was then taken into custody, when he stated that the constable had made a mistake. Mr. Plowden committed the prisoner for trial, and allowed bail.