Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

 Search:


Most Recent Posts:
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by caz 1 minute ago.
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by caz 20 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Charles Cross (Lechmere) - by Herlock Sholmes 30 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Charles Cross (Lechmere) - by Elamarna 33 minutes ago.
Catherine Eddowes: Kate's Apron - by Wickerman 33 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by caz 39 minutes ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - by erobitha 53 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by caz 55 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Catherine Eddowes: Kate's Apron - (101 posts)
Witnesses: Charles Cross (Lechmere) - (45 posts)
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - (44 posts)
Ripperologist: Ripperologist Magazine #169 - July 2021 - (16 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - (16 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Finding Mary Kelly - (14 posts)


St. James Gazette
London, England
17 September 1888

THE WHITECHAPEL MURDERS

The public of the neighbourhood of Whitechapel continue to make statements, which are committed to writing at Commercial street station, and in several instances the police have been made cognizant of what the informants consider to be suspicious movements of individuals whose appearance is supposed to tally with that of the man who is wanted. Every "clue" given by the public in their zeal to assist the police has been followed up, but without success, and the lapse of time, it is feared, will lessen the chances of discovering the perpetrator of the crimes.

A meeting was held on Saturday of one of the vigilance committees recently formed in Whitechapel. It was reported that there had already been received several contributions to the fund intended to be raised, for offering a reward for the discovery of the murderer. A strong feeling was expressed against the new policy of the Home Office not to offer a reward.