Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Scene of the Crimes: Parson Street? - by rjpalmer 2 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: The One Where James Maybrick was Jack the Ripper - by rjpalmer 25 minutes ago.
Audio -- Visual: Release Date for Kosminski Documentary - by The Baron 34 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: The One Where James Maybrick was Jack the Ripper - by rjpalmer 37 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: The One Where James Maybrick was Jack the Ripper - by Iconoclast 1 hour ago.
Other Mysteries: ** The Murder of Julia Wallace ** - by Abby Normal 2 hours ago.
General Discussion: Is it even possible? - by John Wheat 4 hours ago.
Other Mysteries: ** The Murder of Julia Wallace ** - by Herlock Sholmes 5 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
General Discussion: Is it even possible? - (8 posts)
Kosminski, Aaron: New Tests on Tilly letter prove it genuine - (8 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Cross - (7 posts)
Levy, Jacob: Any connection between Israel Lipski Trial and motive for Jack the Ripper? - (6 posts)
Maybrick, James: The One Where James Maybrick was Jack the Ripper - (5 posts)
Other Mysteries: ** The Murder of Julia Wallace ** - (4 posts)


The Graphic
United Kingdom
19 September 1888

Coroners' Inquests and the Detection of Crime.

In the case of the late horrifying murders in Whitechapel, some persons have alleged that the Coroner's Court exceeded its legal function by making an unnecessarily exhaustive inquiry. There can be no doubt that occasionally such a complaint is well founded. Where there is a prisoner in custody in suspicion of having committed the murder, it is manifestly absurd, although the practice is common enough, for precisely the same evidence to be given day after day both before the police magistrate and the coroner. In such a case the Coroner's Court has sufficiently done its duty when it has ascertained the cause of death, and, as Mr. Rowland Williams aptly remarks, has preserved the evidences of the crime, if any exist. In the case, however, of the Whitechapel butcheries, matters were altogether different. No one was arrests against whom sufficient evidence was adduced to warrant his examination in a police court, and therefore the Coroner's Court afforded the only legal machinery available for collecting sworn evidence which might assist the police in their search for the criminal. As regards the action of the police, there is a tendency in some quarters to sneer at the efficiency of our detective arrangements because the person or persons by whom these terrible crimes have been committed are still at large. But surely this is very unreasonable, seeing that the police are men, like ourselves, possessed of no preternatural powers. Murderers who escape immediate seizure are usually ultimately captured, either because there has been some previous acquaintance between them and their victim, or through their attempts to dispose of the plunder they have acquired. But so long as it was supposed - and not unnaturally - that the Whitechapel murderer was actuated by a simple lust for homicide, it was plain that he might escape without leaving any serviceable clue behind him. The medical evidence, however, throws a different light in the matter. It seems pretty certain that this forlorn creature, Annie Chapman, was killed for a mercenary motive - a motive resembling, yet even exceeding in atrocity, the villainies perpetrated by the notorious Burke and Hare sixty years ago.