Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
General Discussion: The Seaside Home: Could Schwartz or Lawende Have Put the Ripper's Neck in a Noose? - by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 1 hour ago.
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 1 hour ago.
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 2 hours ago.
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - by Wickerman 2 hours ago.
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 2 hours ago.
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - by Tom_Wescott 2 hours ago.
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - by Wickerman 2 hours ago.
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - by Wickerman 3 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Other Mysteries: JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year - (100 posts)
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - (79 posts)
Kosminski, Aaron: The Jewish Standard Friday 14 November 1910 - (33 posts)
General Discussion: The Seaside Home: Could Schwartz or Lawende Have Put the Ripper's Neck in a Noose? - (11 posts)
From Hell (Lusk) Letter: Lusk Letter and Suggested Irish Syntax - (4 posts)
Social Chat: Pub Talk - (2 posts)


The Bush Advocate
New Zealand

1 November 1888

LATEST NEWS

New York, Oct. 28.
Colonel Hughes-Hallett, who is now on a visit to the United States, was interviewed by the representative of one the papers in this city. He declared that the reason the Queen had never manifested her displeasure at his conduct by depriving him of his military rank, or in other ways putting him under the ban of society, was because she was fully aware of the real facts of the case, which went to prove he was not so guilty as report averred.