Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Maybrick, James: The Diary — Old Hoax or New or Not a Hoax at All?​ - by Scott Nelson 25 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: The Diary — Old Hoax or New or Not a Hoax at All?​ - by Scott Nelson 30 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: The Diary — Old Hoax or New or Not a Hoax at All?​ - by rjpalmer 1 hour ago.
Maybrick, James: The Diary — Old Hoax or New or Not a Hoax at All?​ - by Lombro2 2 hours ago.
Witnesses: Robert Paul Time Issues - by Fiver 2 hours ago.
Witnesses: Robert Paul Time Issues - by Fiver 2 hours ago.
Witnesses: Robert Paul Time Issues - by Fiver 2 hours ago.
Witnesses: Robert Paul Time Issues - by Fiver 3 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Witnesses: Robert Paul Time Issues - (30 posts)
Maybrick, James: The Diary — Old Hoax or New or Not a Hoax at All?​ - (29 posts)
Pub Talk: Irritations - (3 posts)
Witnesses: Was She Wrong? - (3 posts)
Goulston Street Graffito: Does the Goulston Street Graffito eliminate Jewish Immigrants as suspects? - (3 posts)


Jack the Ripper: End of a Legend
Calum Reuben Knight
Athena Press, 2005
Softcover. 316pp
ISBN: 1844014843

Casebook Review:

A strange book which straddles the line between fact and fiction. As fiction, it actually succeeds and is quite readable. But as non-fiction - it is, after all, marketed as "True Crime" - it ranks as one of the most implausible Ripper theories ever to hit the market. Through a series of improbably arcane and convoluted anagrams, Knight purports to show that "Jack the Ripper" was actually three people - George Hutchinson, Joseph Barnett, and Mary Jane Kelly. Knight trots out marriage entries and census records to support his argument, but none of them are convincing.

If this book had been written and marketed as fiction, it would have garnered a much better recommendation. Knight has an excellent command of language and his writing style is both readable and evocative. But as non-fiction, the book falls flat. Not recommended.