Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
General Suspect Discussion: Favoured Suspect... - by John Wheat 1 hour ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Favoured Suspect... - by Abby Normal 1 hour ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Broad Shoulders, Elizabeth's Killer ? - by JeffHamm 2 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Favoured Suspect... - by John Wheat 3 hours ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Broad Shoulders, Elizabeth's Killer ? - by c.d. 5 hours ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Broad Shoulders, Elizabeth's Killer ? - by c.d. 5 hours ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Broad Shoulders, Elizabeth's Killer ? - by c.d. 5 hours ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Broad Shoulders, Elizabeth's Killer ? - by NotBlamedForNothing 6 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Scene of the Crimes: Broad Shoulders, Elizabeth's Killer ? - (34 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Favoured Suspect... - (14 posts)
Mary Ann Nichols: Was Polly moved to Bucks Row ? - (3 posts)
Ripperologist: Ripperologist #172 - (3 posts)
General Discussion: Any known pubs on Chicksand Street in 1888? Old Pewter Pub Tankard from Whitechapel - (3 posts)


Bowling Green University Press, 1987 (softcover)
Age of Sex Crime, The
Caputi, Jane
Ohio: Bowling Green University Press. 1987.
246pp. Illustrated, Index. [Partial Ripper Content]
ISBN: 0879723866

Casebook Review:

Much of Caputi's Age of Sex Crime is either devoted to the Ripper, or spent in comparing the actions of modern males to those of the Ripper (if only figuratively). Her thesis is more or less that the idea of "Jack the Ripper" is an encapsulation of all the hatred and jealousy men subconsciously harbor toward women - hence the perpetuation of the myth through to the modern day. Her work has a great deal of merit, but is marred by several hyper-feminist precepts which can only be classified as "anti-male." Nevertheless, a very different and scholarly feminist perspective. Recommended.