Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Non-Fiction: Cutting Point - by Herlock Sholmes 26 minutes ago.
Witnesses: An even closer look at Black Bag Man - by NotBlamedForNothing 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: The Cross Myth - by Geddy2112 3 hours ago.
Non-Fiction: Cutting Point - by Geddy2112 4 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: The Cross Myth - by Doctored Whatsit 4 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: All roads lead to Lechmere. - by Geddy2112 4 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: All roads lead to Lechmere. - by Geddy2112 4 hours ago.
Non-Fiction: Cutting Point - by Abby Normal 8 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Other Mysteries: JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year - (27 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: All roads lead to Lechmere. - (20 posts)
Research Related: Goulston Street Apron - FOLDED? - (15 posts)
Non-Fiction: Jack The Ripper - Double Cross (Grzegorz Brzęczyszczykiewicz) - (9 posts)
Witnesses: An even closer look at Black Bag Man - (7 posts)
Non-Fiction: Cutting Point - (7 posts)


St. Martin's Press, 1995 (Hardcover)
Sin, Organized Charity, and the Poor Law in Victorian England
Humphreys, Robert
New York: St. Martin's Press. 1995.
226pp. Illustrated, Bibliography, Index. [Victorian London]
ISBN: 0312127553

Casebook Review:

This book challenges widely-held beliefs about the efficacy of the Charity Organization Society and its alleged epitome of the Victorian values of family, morality, character and thrift. The received impression of a powerful, respected, national network of provincial Charity Organization Societies each organizing poor relief in their locality is shown to be illusory. Now that the blatant failure of the Charity Organization Society to satisfy their own guidelines on poor relief has been exposed we can ask whether they had the right to rebuke others about sin.