Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Visual Media: The Missing Evidence - Dissection. - by Elamarna 20 minutes ago.
Visual Media: The Missing Evidence - Dissection. - by Geddy2112 30 minutes ago.
General Suspect Discussion: The Missing Evidence II - New Ripper Documentary - Aug 2024 - by Geddy2112 40 minutes ago.
General Discussion: Ripper Walking Tours - by Holmes' Idiot Brother 52 minutes ago.
General Discussion: They All Love Jack- what did you think of this book? - by erobitha 1 hour ago.
General Discussion: They All Love Jack- what did you think of this book? - by Tracland 2 hours ago.
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - by JeffHamm 4 hours ago.
General Discussion: Ripper Walking Tours - by Barnaby 5 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
General Suspect Discussion: The Missing Evidence II - New Ripper Documentary - Aug 2024 - (42 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - (18 posts)
General Discussion: They All Love Jack- what did you think of this book? - (12 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Suspects - (10 posts)
Visual Media: The Missing Evidence - Dissection. - (10 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - (6 posts)


St. Martin's Press, 1995 (Hardcover)
Sin, Organized Charity, and the Poor Law in Victorian England
Humphreys, Robert
New York: St. Martin's Press. 1995.
226pp. Illustrated, Bibliography, Index. [Victorian London]
ISBN: 0312127553

Casebook Review:

This book challenges widely-held beliefs about the efficacy of the Charity Organization Society and its alleged epitome of the Victorian values of family, morality, character and thrift. The received impression of a powerful, respected, national network of provincial Charity Organization Societies each organizing poor relief in their locality is shown to be illusory. Now that the blatant failure of the Charity Organization Society to satisfy their own guidelines on poor relief has been exposed we can ask whether they had the right to rebuke others about sin.