Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Elizabeth Stride: The Schwartz/BS Man situation - My opinion only - by Mark J D 2 hours ago.
Elizabeth Stride: The Schwartz/BS Man situation - My opinion only - by Wickerman 4 hours ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Location of lamps etc - by kjab3112 4 hours ago.
Suspects: A closer look at Leon Goldstein - by Wickerman 5 hours ago.
Elizabeth Stride: Elizabeth's murder and the double event - by Mark J D 5 hours ago.
Elizabeth Stride: The Schwartz/BS Man situation - My opinion only - by Mark J D 6 hours ago.
Elizabeth Stride: The Schwartz/BS Man situation - My opinion only - by c.d. 6 hours ago.
Elizabeth Stride: The Schwartz/BS Man situation - My opinion only - by Mark J D 6 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Suspects: A closer look at Leon Goldstein - (16 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: The Schwartz/BS Man situation - My opinion only - (11 posts)
Hutchinson, George: A closer look at George Hutchinson - (9 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: Location of lamps etc - (7 posts)
Mary Ann Nichols: What are side-spring shoes? - (3 posts)
Pub Talk: Useless Thread... - (3 posts)


St. Martin's Press, 1995 (Hardcover)
Sin, Organized Charity, and the Poor Law in Victorian England
Humphreys, Robert
New York: St. Martin's Press. 1995.
226pp. Illustrated, Bibliography, Index. [Victorian London]
ISBN: 0312127553

Casebook Review:

This book challenges widely-held beliefs about the efficacy of the Charity Organization Society and its alleged epitome of the Victorian values of family, morality, character and thrift. The received impression of a powerful, respected, national network of provincial Charity Organization Societies each organizing poor relief in their locality is shown to be illusory. Now that the blatant failure of the Charity Organization Society to satisfy their own guidelines on poor relief has been exposed we can ask whether they had the right to rebuke others about sin.