|
 |
 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
    
Tim_308
Unregistered guest
| | Posted on Thursday, December 08, 2005 - 12:38 pm: | 
|
I guess I just don't see what's wrong with somebody having a lot of detail in a statement?
If you noticed yourself that somebody was suspicious wouldn't you take in as many details as possible?
Instead of describing Hutchinson's description as "over the top" in terms of details I would say that ALL of the other statements from witnesses are extremely vague and lacking and must have come from people that were not good at describing things and were not very perceptive. Doesn't that make more sense?
I am not trying to defend Hutchinson, I am trying to find what the reasoning is for such doubt.
Honestly, all of the other witness statements were poor in details, they were not average in detail, I'd say Hutchinson's is closer to average in detail. Either the cops did a bad job of taking statements or the witnesses didn't know how to describe things or weren't perceptive enough to notice more details. |
|
Use of these
message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use.
The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and
operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive
is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping.
The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements.
You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to
an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.
|
|
|
|
