Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
About the Casebook

 Search:
 

Join the Chat Room!

Could they have known Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Message Boards » Police Officials » General Discussion / Other Police Officials » Could they have known « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bill
Unregistered guest
Posted on Monday, November 10, 2003 - 1:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

is it possible that some of the police constables
could have known who was doing it. or had a general idea,but were not saying any thing. it
seems strange that they kept there beat widely
covered, and yet none of them saw nothing. or
heard nothing.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Frank van Oploo
Sergeant
Username: Franko

Post Number: 20
Registered: 9-2003
Posted on Thursday, November 20, 2003 - 4:58 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hey there Bill,

Although it's possible, I can't think of one good reason why anyone, let alone a constable, would not have said anything in case he or she knew who Jack the Ripper was. Some thought they had a general idea, but in each of these cases it turned out to be a wrong idea and this was probably because both the police and the public were looking for the wrong kind of man. Jack killed and mutilated like a monster, so they probably thought he also had to look like one - I think quite the opposite was closer to the truth.

I think it's more likely that the constables didn't see anything suspicious because Jack most probably knew the streets and alleyways of Whitechapel like the back of his hand and at least his victims must have had a good idea of how long they would have with their clients before the next constanble would pass by. The reason why they (or anybody for that matter) didn't hear anything suspicious must be that he 'worked' silently.

All the best,
Frank
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sarah Long
Detective Sergeant
Username: Sarah

Post Number: 53
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Friday, November 21, 2003 - 7:02 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Bill,

I have to agree with Frank here. It's not very likely. The reason the police didn't see anything is mostly because, the prostitutes weren't about to 'conduct their business' where they knew the police would be. This made them very vunerable and part of the reason he may have killed them.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Register now! Administration

Use of these message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use. The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping. The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements. You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.