|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Spinner Unregistered guest
| Posted on Sunday, August 31, 2003 - 1:16 pm: | |
Hello, I was intrigued that, given the extent of the horrific injuries to the victims, to what extent did the press at the time go to in their reports? Did they convey the full extent of the injuries or just stick with saying the victims were mutilated? Also for example were the inverted 'v's on Eddowes face reported in the press at the time? It intrigues me that if the murderer was at the head end of the victim ie. out of the blood and gore, then they would actually have been v's to the perpetrator. Look forward to any replies. |
|
Use of these
message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use.
The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and
operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper. Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive
is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping.
The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements.
You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to
an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.
|
|
|
|