|
 |
 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
    
Irritated Newbie
Unregistered guest
| | Posted on Thursday, January 06, 2005 - 1:30 pm: |       |
I have just recently viewed these boards for the first time, and I don't think I can stand to come back any more. Apparently many of you folks don't realize that ALL the so called evidence on any one of your suspects is circumstantial, after the fact, heresay, a dead guys opinion, speculation......... blah blah...
If your so-called HARD EVIDENCE that you blast Cornwell for not having existed for anyone, there would be no mystery at all, would there! Yet there is, so...
to bash one book full of the same junk that is in all of the rest is pretty weak, especially when some of you discount some of her assertions without backing up your opposing view of Sickert.
I'm no expert on this information, but I don't need to be to know these discussions are for the most part not objectively thought out.
I could go on, but you get the idea I think.
Happy worthless ranting!!
P.S. This sight in general is a fantastic rescourse for information, though. Well done. |
Thomas C. Wescott
Inspector
Username: Tom_wescott
Post Number: 285
Registered: 4-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, January 06, 2005 - 10:35 pm: | |
The junk in Cornwell's book is not the same junk as is in all the rest. She came up with a dump of her own. All her own. Her research is reprehensible, particularly considering her resources. Thanks for stopping by. Perhaps you'd more enjoy www.zodiackiller.com, and be sure to subscribe to Ripperana.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott |
Robert W. House
Inspector
Username: Robhouse
Post Number: 168
Registered: 2-2003
| | Posted on Friday, January 07, 2005 - 12:56 am: | |
Its funny how every so often a person stumbles across this site after being "convinced" by Patricia Cornball's idiotic theory, then procedes to call the rest of us dumb. Oh well... we will not hear from this guy again anyways.
RH |
AIP
Unregistered guest
| | Posted on Friday, January 07, 2005 - 3:43 am: | |
Just a few words on this odd thread. What is 'heresay' (I suppose it should be hearsay). 'Irritated's' statement that Cornwell's book is 'ful of the same junk that is in all of the rest' shows how little the poster reads or understands.
And this is a site, not a 'sight'. |
|
Use of these
message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use.
The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and
operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive
is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping.
The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements.
You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to
an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.
|
|
|
|
