Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
About the Casebook

 Search:
 

Join the Chat Room!

Portrait of the Artist as a Young Killer Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Message Boards » Suspects » General Discussion » Portrait of the Artist as a Young Killer « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jeff Rients
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, October 07, 2004 - 1:54 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Howdy, folks.

Colin Wilson, in his Mammoth Book of True Crime 2, claims that in his experience members of two occupations do not ordinarily commit lustmord: butchers and artists. He maintains that people already professionally engaged in the act of butchering animals do not develop the elaborate blood-fantasies that lead to lustmord and that artistic types are able to pour these fantasies into their craft. Unfortunately, Mr. Wilson provides little in the way of evidence to back up these claims. Do his theories pan out? In particular, are artists under-represented in the field of murder? And if so, does this mean that the purported Ripper material in Sickert's paintings actual serve as counter-evidence that he was the Ripper?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stuart
Unregistered guest
Posted on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 10:36 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hi Jeff,
You wrote "are artists under-represented in the field of murder"? I take no pleasure in telling you this , but the biggest murdering bastard ghoul in history was an out of work artist: His name was Adolph Hitler.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Turnage
Unregistered guest
Posted on Saturday, July 02, 2005 - 10:51 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Stuart,

Hitler ordered the murders,and not to my knowledge, commit them with his own hand. Therefore, he is not guilty of lustmord.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stuart
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, July 07, 2005 - 1:15 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hi Turnage,

You are 100% right when you say he did not commit all of the 2nd World War murders. However Turnage, I think that it is a case of - if he could have killed all by his own hand he would have , but it was not practicle. So we are talking points of technicallity here. Thanks.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Register now! Administration

Use of these message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use. The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping. The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements. You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.