|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Chris Scott
Chief Inspector Username: Chris
Post Number: 948 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 9:07 am: | |
I am listing below some relevant data I have pulled from the 1871 census. There will be more to come!! :-) 1871 Census MARTHA TABRAM PRO REFERENCE: RG/10/606 Address: 20 Marshall Street, Southwark, London Household: Head: Henry Tabram aged 35 born Whitechapel Furniture Porter Wife: Martha Tabram aged 21 born Southwark, Surrey Children: Henry Tabram aged 10 born Southwark Frederick Tabram aged 1 month born Southwark. ELIZABETH STRIDE PRO REFERENCE: RG/10/586 Address: 178 High Street, Poplar, London Household: Head: John Stride aged 40 born Kent Carpenter Wife: Elizabeth Stride aged 27 born Sweden Visitor: Charles Thew aged 15 born Portsmouth MARY ANN NICHOLS PRO REFERENCE: RG/10/617 Address: 131 Trafalgar Street, Lambeth, London Household: Father in Law: Edward Walker aged 51 boen London Blacksmith Head: William Nichols aged 30 born Oxford Printer Wife: Mary A Nichols aged 25 born London Children: Edward Nichols aged 5 born London Percy Nichols aged 3 born London Alice Nichols aged 7 months born London JOSEPH FLEMING PRO REFERENCE: RG/10/489 Address: 61 Wellington Street, Bethnal Green, London Household: Head: Richard Fleming aged 49 born Ramsgate, Kent Plasterer Wife: Henrietta Fleming aged 49 born Camberwell, Surrey Children: Jane Fleming aged 14 born Hoxton Servant Joseph Fleming aged 12 born Bethnal Green Mary Ann Fleming aged 8 born Bethnal Green Jessie Fleming aged 3 born Bethnal Green CATHERINE EDDOWES PRO REFERENCE: RG/10/602 Address: 1 Queen Street, Southwark, London Household: Head: Thomas Conway aged 36 born Mayo, Ireland Pedlar Wife: Catherine Conway aged 28 born Wolverhampton, Stafford Laundress Children: Catherine M. Conway aged 7 born Yarmouth, Norfolk Thomas Conway aged 3 born Westminster ANNIE CHAPMAN PRO REFERENCE: RG/10/130 Address: 29 Montpelier Place, Westminster, London Household: Head: Ruth Smith aged 51 born Hurstmonceux, Sussex Widowed Laundress Daughter: Georgeanna Smith aged 15 born Windsor, Berkshire Marian R Smith aged 12 born Windsor, Berkshire Visitors: John Chapman aged 28 born Westminster, Middlesex Eliza A Chapman aged 29 born Suffolk Emily R Chapman aged 9 months born Westminster. Certain questions are raised by this data, mainly regarding children e.g. Martha Tabram at 21 is listed with a 10 year old son! His age is right as I have verified it from 1881 data. the Joseph Fleming listed is he who was listed on another thread as being by far the most likely to be Mary Kelly's Fleming. It is good to fill in some family details for him. The entry for Eddowes allows us to fill in some details for Thomas Conway i.e. his age and place of birth. Watch this space Chris |
Chris Phillips
Inspector Username: Cgp100
Post Number: 219 Registered: 2-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 10:12 am: | |
Many thanks for posting those census data. You certainly seem to have hit a rich vein! Normally I would interpret the Tabram entry as indicating the younger Henry to be the son of the elder one (as head of the household), but presumably by a wife previous to Martha? Chris Phillips
|
Andrew Spallek
Inspector Username: Aspallek
Post Number: 436 Registered: 5-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 10:38 am: | |
Chris, That was my first thought, too. But it is interesting that Henry, Jr. was born in Southwark as was Martha, while Henry, Sr. was born in Whitechapel. I think it must be a son from a previous wife/relationship, yet it doesn't look quite right. Andy S. |
Sarah Long
Chief Inspector Username: Sarah
Post Number: 808 Registered: 11-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 11:57 am: | |
Andy, I was just thinking that Henry was probably a child from a previous marriage of his fathers as he is 14 years older than Martha so it's quite likely. Chris, Is there anyway you can have a look on the 1861 census (if it's available) for Henry Tabram to see if he was married before Martha. Sarah |
Andrew Spallek
Inspector Username: Aspallek
Post Number: 438 Registered: 5-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 12:04 pm: | |
Sarah, Yeh, that's true. But it's peculiar that he is born in Southwark like his step-mother, when his father is born in Whitechapel. Both Martha and Henry, Jr. being born in Southwark suggested that they may be natural mother and son, though the relative ages makes this next to impossible. Apparently, the Whitechapel native Henry, Sr. had some other connection with Southwark before returning to Whitechapel. Not at all unlikely. Andy S. |
Sarah Long
Chief Inspector Username: Sarah
Post Number: 811 Registered: 11-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 12:08 pm: | |
Well it wouldn't have been impossible as she would still probably have been able to give birth at 11 but I'd say it's not likely. It's probably just coincidence where they were born. They were living in Southwark though so it may have been possible that Henry moved to Southwark with his wife, they have their son who is obviously then born in Southwark and then his wife dies or leaves and then he meets a local girl (Martha) and they marry. Sarah (Message edited by sarah on March 03, 2004) |
Chris Scott
Chief Inspector Username: Chris
Post Number: 949 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 2:17 pm: | |
To complete the info here is the 1881 data on Henry Jnr. Note here it gives a different place of birth. 1881: Address: 14 River Terrace, Greenwich, Kent Boarder: Henry S Tabran (sic: this is the spelling in 1881 also given for Martha and her children) Aged 20 born St. Georges, Surrey General labourer He was boarding in the house of George and Phoebe Wash and their eight children. I'm attaching below the section from the 1871 showing the Tabram family with both Henrys (senior and junior) and their places of birth. The other thing that intrigues me is who the young visitor, Charles Thew, was who was staying with the Strides! All the best Chris
|
Chris Scott
Chief Inspector Username: Chris
Post Number: 950 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 2:37 pm: | |
I have searched for marriage(s) for Henry Tabram Snr and this stage can only find that between Henry Samuel Tabram and Martha White in the fourth quarter of 1869 at Newington However, I have managed to locate Henry Jnr in the 1891 census. By that time he was married and his wife's name was Martha tabram also! He was married in Woolwich during the first quarter of 1884 to Martha Ann M Wash - one of the children of the family he was boarding with in 1881. By 1891 they are listed as follows: 1 Fearon Street, Greenwich, London Head: Henry Tabram aged 30 born Westminster General labourer Wife: Martha Tabram aged 28 born Greenwich, Kent In 1901 Henry (aged 40) and Martha (aged 38) are listed as still living in Greenwich but no children are listed. In 1901 data Henry Jnr's place of birth is listed as Newington! It just shows how unreliable a piece of data this field in that over the four censuses from 1871 to 1901 he is given four different birthplaces! Chris |
Chris Scott
Chief Inspector Username: Chris
Post Number: 951 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 2:40 pm: | |
Just to keep this thread up to date I have posted the 1871 on Roslyn D'Onston on his thread at ../4922/9964.html"#C6C6B5"> |
Chris Scott
Chief Inspector Username: Chris
Post Number: 952 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 2:57 pm: | |
Fred Abberline is listed in 1871 as follows: Kentish Town Road Police Station Frederick Abberline aged 28 Police Sergeant Widowed Born Blandford Indicdentally, his surname is listed in the index as Abbertone! Chris |
Natalie Severn
Inspector Username: Severn
Post Number: 373 Registered: 11-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 4:21 pm: | |
Fascinating information Chris.I too wonder who this chap may be visiting them. Best Natalie |
Neal Shelden
Detective Sergeant Username: Neal
Post Number: 114 Registered: 3-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 5:51 pm: | |
Great work Chris to find Catherine Eddowes elusive 1871 census entry. Thomas Conway's military record reveals that he was born at Kilgever near Mayo. Her daughter Annie was born Catherine Annie as the census confirms. Two years after the census their next child Alfred George Conway was born in Southwark. I hope Chris that you can eventually track down the other elusive census years for Mary Ann Nichols (1861), and Annie Chapman (1841?,1851 and 1861). |
Chris Scott
Chief Inspector Username: Chris
Post Number: 953 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 6:33 pm: | |
Hi Neal Many thanks - I'm attaching the census entries for the Conways from 1871 in case you'd like to see (these spread over two census sheets) All the best Chris
|
Chris Scott
Chief Inspector Username: Chris
Post Number: 954 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 - 6:37 pm: | |
Heal Can you clear up one point for me? The son that was born to th conways in 1868- the A-Z says he was named George, the 1871 census says he was Thomas. Can you throw any light on this? Many thanks Chris
|
Neal Shelden
Detective Sergeant Username: Neal
Post Number: 115 Registered: 3-2003
| Posted on Thursday, March 04, 2004 - 8:00 am: | |
Thanks for the census entry Chris, Although, I never found a birth certificate for their eldest son he is recorded on 1881, 1901, and now the 1871 census as Thomas Conway, and also his death certificate in 1903 when he died in Chelsea aged 36. His brother was born Alfred George Conway in 1873 at the Mint Street Workhouse that backed on to Queen Street in Southwark. He was called George on the 1881 census. If they can be found on the 1891 census, I would expect Thomas and his two sons to be together possibly in Westmister, but I'm not certain as to what happened to Alfred George? Their father died in 1908. Thanks again Chris. |
Chris Scott
Chief Inspector Username: Chris
Post Number: 957 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Thursday, March 04, 2004 - 12:28 pm: | |
Heal I am reasonably certain I have found Thomas Conway the younger (born 1868) in the 1891 census. He is listed as a night watchman in a lodging house at 12-14 Lombard Street, St George The Martyr, London. the mangers of the lodging house were Thomas and Elizabeth Groves. His details are listed as follows: Thomas Conway Servant Single Age 24 Night Watchman Lodging House Born Westminster London Thomas Snr is listed living with his other son at 9 Parker Street, Westminster as follows: Head: Thomas Conway Widower Age very hard to read but looks like 53 Hawker Born Westport, Ireland Son: George Conway Single Age 17 General labourer Born Southwark I have to find any trace of the daughter, Catherine M Conway but will carry on looking:-) Chris
|
Neal Shelden
Detective Sergeant Username: Neal
Post Number: 116 Registered: 3-2003
| Posted on Thursday, March 04, 2004 - 4:20 pm: | |
Excellent Chris! Daughter Annie Phillips (previously Catherine Annie Conway) was at 13 Dix's Place, Bermondsey, òn the 1891 census with husband Louis Phillips and their children. I would say that the census enumerator must have written down the wrong initial 'M' for her middle name in 1871 because her middle name on her birth certificate for Yarmouth in 1863 was definately Ann. Thanks again Chris |
Neal Shelden
Detective Sergeant Username: Neal
Post Number: 118 Registered: 3-2003
| Posted on Thursday, March 04, 2004 - 5:11 pm: | |
Chris, Did you note which address George Conway was living at in Southwark for 1891? Also, sorry to go on, but are the indexes you are using for the 1871 census and 1891 census freely available because there are just a few mysteries remaining concerning Annie Chapman's family. They are: Where was "Annie Georgina Chapman" single, aged 17 or 18 for the "1891 census" probably in London, but could be Berkshire or Surrey? She was Annie's daughter. Where was "Emily (Latitia) Smith" single, aged 27 for the "1871 census" and single? aged 47 for the "1891 census" probably London? She was Annie's sister. And "Fountain or Fontain Smith" for the 1891 census, married to Edith, aged 30. It could be though, that Fountain and his family were in the USA in 1891 but I'm not certain? |
Chris Scott
Chief Inspector Username: Chris
Post Number: 960 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Thursday, March 04, 2004 - 7:34 pm: | |
Hi Neal George Conway was living with his father at 9 Parker Street in 1891 I will check out the other bits for you asap tomorrow and let you know All the best Chris
|
Neal Shelden
Detective Sergeant Username: Neal
Post Number: 119 Registered: 3-2003
| Posted on Saturday, March 06, 2004 - 7:10 am: | |
Hi Chris, Sorry I misread the item above. George was living with his father in Westminster, and born at Southwark. Thanks. Will await your further finds with great interest. All the best Neal |
Chris Scott
Assistant Commissioner Username: Chris
Post Number: 1044 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 10, 2004 - 5:25 pm: | |
Have found the 1871 entry for Annie Elizabeth Crook of Royal conspiracy fame 9 Upper Rathbone Place, Marylebone, London Head: William Crook aged 40 born Eaton, Bucks Pianoforte finisher Wife: Annie Crook aged 32 born Berwick on Tweed Children: Annie E Crook aged 8 born London Alice Crook aged 2 born St Pancras, Middlesex Catherine Crook aged 7 months born Marylebone In 1881 the family were at 2 Rose Street and Ennie Elizabeth is wrongly noted in the index as Annie J 2 Rose Street, Middlesex Head: William Crook aged 50 born Eton, Buckingham Pianoforte finisher Wife: Sarah A Crook aged 42 born Scotland (from aged and place of birth, this is the same as the Annie Crook of 1971) Children: Annie J Crook aged 18 born London General domestic servant Alice Crook aged 12 born London I can find no trace of the third daughter, Catherine, who may have died between 1871 and 1881. In 1891 census, William Crook's aged mother and siblings are listed as living at 26 High Street, Eton. Head: Elizabeth Crook aged 87 - widowed Born Witton, Middlesex Living on own means Children: Isabella J Crook aged 52 born Eton William A Crook aged 44 born Eton Clerk Servant: Ellan Evans aged 38 born Reading Another possible son of Elizabeth and sibling of William Crook is listed a few doors away: 28 High Street, Eton: Head: John Crook aged 49 born Eton - Decorator Wife: Sarah S Crook aged 47 born Shipton
|
Chris Scott
Assistant Commissioner Username: Chris
Post Number: 1045 Registered: 4-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, March 10, 2004 - 5:26 pm: | |
Have found the 1871 entry for Annie Elizabeth Crook of Royal conspiracy fame 9 Upper Rathbone Place, Marylebone, London Head: William Crook aged 40 born Eaton, Bucks Pianoforte finisher Wife: Annie Crook aged 32 born Berwick on Tweed Children: Annie E Crook aged 8 born London Alice Crook aged 2 born St Pancras, Middlesex Catherine Crook aged 7 months born Marylebone In 1881 the family were at 2 Rose Street and Ennie Elizabeth is wrongly noted in the index as Annie J 2 Rose Street, Middlesex Head: William Crook aged 50 born Eton, Buckingham Pianoforte finisher Wife: Sarah A Crook aged 42 born Scotland (from aged and place of birth, this is the same as the Annie Crook of 1971) Children: Annie J Crook aged 18 born London General domestic servant Alice Crook aged 12 born London I can find no trace of the third daughter, Catherine, who may have died between 1871 and 1881. In 1891 census, William Crook's aged mother and siblings are listed as living at 26 High Street, Eton. Head: Elizabeth Crook aged 87 - widowed Born Witton, Middlesex Living on own means Children: Isabella J Crook aged 52 born Eton William A Crook aged 44 born Eton Clerk Servant: Ellan Evans aged 38 born Reading Another possible son of Elizabeth and sibling of William Crook is listed a few doors away: 28 High Street, Eton: Head: John Crook aged 49 born Eton - Decorator Wife: Sarah S Crook aged 47 born Shipton
|
Debra Arif Unregistered guest
| Posted on Monday, September 27, 2004 - 9:30 am: | |
Hi Neal I am just wondering if this question posted from you in the above thread was ever answered, as I can't find it on the boards. >>Where was "Annie Georgina Chapman" single, aged 17 or 18 for the "1891 census" probably in London, but could be Berkshire or Surrey? She was Annie's daughter. Where was "Emily (Latitia) Smith" single, aged 27 for the "1871 census" and single? aged 47 for the "1891 census" probably London? She was Annie's sister.<< I have the 1891 entry for these two ladies if you haven't already seen it by now, or anyone else who may be interested. regards Debra |
|
Use of these
message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use.
The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and
operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper. Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive
is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping.
The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements.
You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to
an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.
|
|
|
|