Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
About the Casebook

 Search:
 

Join the Chat Room!

Christopher Smith and Jack the Ripper... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Message Boards » General Discussion » Help Requests » Christopher Smith and Jack the Ripper: the Alembic Connection « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Theo Paijmans
Unregistered guest
Posted on Monday, June 23, 2003 - 10:12 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I read that on the criminologist there's an article in 3 parts by one Christopher Smith entitled: the Alembic Connection.

Has anyone read it, is it any good, and what's the main theory of this author?

Best,

theo
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dan Norder
Chief Inspector
Username: Dannorder

Post Number: 602
Registered: 4-2004
Posted on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 - 12:58 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

This is an extremely late reply, but I just read the series and decided to go looking to see if the author wrote anything else, and found this thread.

Yes I've read it, it's not any good, and the main theory is that those sneaky occultists in the Golden Dawn took prostitutes who were on their periods to abandoned cemeteries to be slain in Tantric sex rituals so their uteruses could be removed to turn lead into gold and then transported the bodies so that they could be dropped in the form of a cross and Mary Jane Kelly was really in on it and killed someone else in her bed and yada yada yada.

The theory actually tosses out several possibilities, many that contradict each other, but that seems to be the thrust of his arguments. Yet after all that and repeatedly naming Dr. Westcott as the main man behind it all he oddly tacks on a single sentence at the end claiming that Druitt was still the most likely suspect, even though he made no attempts previously to come up with anything that could link Druitt even by association to the types he was talking about. I don't know if he didn't take his own theory that seriously or if he meant that line to be sarcastic.
Dan Norder, Editor
Ripper Notes: The International Journal for Ripper Studies
 Profile    Email    Dissertations    Website

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Register now! Administration

Use of these message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use. The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping. The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements. You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.