|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Zoe
Unregistered guest
| Posted on Thursday, July 14, 2005 - 5:14 am: |
|
Everyone was so helpful the last time i posted a question so thought i would post another one. I read somewhere that Dr Thomas Stowell was the first to propose the Royal conspiracy theory, is this correct? And when was theory first proposed? Also, is the "Mason" theory related to the Royal theory, or are they the same or completely different? I am a little confused. I am trying to get a timeline of when major jack the ripper theories were made and by who. Finally, in your opinion, has modern science really produced 'ground breaking' evidence that has contributed to the jack the ripper case? Your opinions and help is appreciated Zoe |
John Savage
Inspector Username: Johnsavage
Post Number: 438 Registered: 2-2003
| Posted on Friday, July 15, 2005 - 1:26 pm: |
|
Hi Zoe, Have a look at the dissertations page, and click on the one entitled "On The Origins Of The Royal Conspiracy". I think it will answer your question. Has modern science produced "ground breaking evidence", not in my opinion, but I am sure others may take a different view. Rgds John |
|
Use of these
message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use.
The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and
operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper. Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive
is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping.
The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements.
You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to
an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.
|
|
|
|