|
 |
 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
    
Chris Scott
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Chris
Post Number: 2107
Registered: 4-2003
| | Posted on Monday, June 27, 2005 - 5:22 pm: | 
|
The murder referred to in the letter is that of Mary Ann Austin.
The Times
3 June 1901
DORSET STREET, SPITALFIELDS
TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES
Sir,
It is to be hoped that the public attention drawn on Dorset street, Spitalfields, by the murder there will help on some needed reforms. To all save those of us who have had opportunity of studying this street and the courts around it at first hand it seems impossible that such a breeding spot of crime should be allowed to continue. Although quite a short thoroughfare, it can boast of more deeds of violence than any other district in London. Its population largely consists of thieves and their associates. Policemen go down it in pairs. There mere knocking senseless and rifling the pockets of some half drunken visitor in the open roadway is quite frequent. One alley is known among some of the older residents as "Blood Alley," on account of the amount of human blood that has been shed there. There are few houses in Dorset street which have not seen at least one murder, and one house is often declared to have had a murder in every room. How true this is I cannot say, but I do know that the same house has had a history which for sheer horror surpasses almost everything in the criminal annals of this country.
The lodging houses of Dorset street are bad, but they are not the worst part of the street. Doubtless the owners of some of them do their best to preserve a show of orderliness. It is unnecessary to dwell on the evils fostered by the many double bedded cubicles open to all who can pay the few pence necessary. Many lads, old enough to be free from school, break away from home and live in these lodging houses. Thrown in association with criminals, they quickly become initiated in crime. Nominally they earn their living by chance work on the streets. Too often they are taught the craft of the petty thief. For some time one young man, a sort of captain among them, had quite a gang of organized pilferers drifting between Dorset street and Notting hill. He at last disappeared, but similar gangs still exist, and boys are drawn from working class homes into them and are made life criminals.
Women who find themselves homeless in London, often innocent and the victims of misfortune, get driven in such lodging houses as these, for there is practically nowhere else for them to go. The result is obvious. The "furnished rooms" which flourish around Dorset street are still more harmful than the lodging houses.
That such a place, within a mile of the Mansion house, should be suffered to continue is no credit to London. Yet what is to be done? Doles are about as effective a cure for the ills of this black s pot as cold cream would be a remedy for cancer. If private philanthropy could have m,ade an end of Dorset street it would have gone long ago. But property such as it is very profitable. In spite of long continued efforts it has been impossible to discover the names of the freeholders of the land, or steps could be taken to rouse them to activity. What reforms are to come must come from the from the various public authorities. May I suggest some obviously needed imrpovements?
First, much might be done to save the younger children of Dorset street of the London School Board took special measures to enforce their attendance at school. Compulsory education is practically a dead letter there. The children wander with their parents from one lodging house to another, and so slip through the educational net. The driving of these children to school would admittedly be very difficult, and would require special school attendance officers.
More police are necessary. The police in this district have a rough time, and I understand that they show a larger proportion of wounds, disablememts, and deaths from violence than any other metropolitan section. Their duties are rendered more severe by the fact that they are miserably undermanned.
Some slight effort might be made by the local authorities to enforce the laws against open immorality.
But the only adequate cure for Dorset street is to sweep it away. Doubtless it is convenient for the police to have such a criminal centre, where they can continually lay hands on wanted men. But Dorset street makes crime as well as shelters it, and its continued presence as now is a real danger to all London.
Yours faithfully,
Fred. A. McKenzie
602 Birkbeck Bank chambers, Chancery lane, W.C.
May 30. |
John Savage
Inspector
Username: Johnsavage
Post Number: 430
Registered: 2-2003
| | Posted on Monday, June 27, 2005 - 6:50 pm: |
|
Hi Chris,
What an excellent decription of Dorset Street, very interesting, and thanks for posting it.
Rgds
John |
|
Use of these
message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use.
The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and
operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive
is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping.
The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements.
You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to
an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.
|
|
|
|
