Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
About the Casebook

 Search:
 

Join the Chat Room!

Fingerprints on Stamps Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Message Boards » General Discussion » Fingerprints on Stamps « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

victoria alexander
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, March 31, 2005 - 2:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

This email, from the Los Alamos scientist, on their new fingerprint technology regarding JTR's letters to police.

Victoria,

That is an interesting question. If there were ample inorganic elements such as potassium or chlorine present in his fingerprints left on the stamps, and they have not been exposed to water that would wash them off, then it might be possible to detect them.

Chris

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Andrew Spallek
Chief Inspector
Username: Aspallek

Post Number: 768
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Sunday, April 03, 2005 - 12:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

That's very interesting but it suffers from the same weakness as DNA analysis: there is noting to compare it to. Furthermore, nearly all experts agree that the murderer did not write any of the known letters except perhaps the one that accompanied the Lusk kidney.

Andy S.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Diana
Chief Inspector
Username: Diana

Post Number: 571
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Sunday, April 03, 2005 - 4:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Still and all, if there was a way to get a print off that Lusk stamp it should be done. What we suffer from is that we can't imagine the technology of the future. So we don't preserve the evidence from the past. Suppose that in 1888 there had been someone farsighted enough to save a tissue sample from each suspect and label it as well as tissue samples from the crime scenes. They couldn't do anything with it then, but we can now. We don't know what shape the technology of the future will take. It is shortsighted not to preserve every bit of evidence we can now. The evidence is locked in a little time compartment labeled "1888" and the technology in another labeled "the future". If the two are not allowed to connect we achieve nothing. We who are in a third compartment in between them are the only ones who can bridge the gap.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Register now! Administration

Use of these message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use. The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping. The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements. You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.