Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
About the Casebook

 Search:
 

Join the Chat Room!

Dr. Clarke Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Message Boards » General Discussion » Dr. Clarke « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Scott
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Chris

Post Number: 1771
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Monday, March 14, 2005 - 5:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I am currently trying to find some background info about a Dr. Clarke whose house was allegedly entered by the police because a suspect who had been followed went in there. Shades of Lees!!
This came to my notice in the proceedings of a court case from 1890. If anyone has seen any info on this or knows more about Dr. Clarke I would be very grateful.
Interesting also that the case was heard before Justice Stephen, connected with J.K. Stephen
Chris

Here is the info as I have it so far:
The Times 21 January 1890

Queen's Bench Division

(Before Mr. Justice Stephen and a Common Jury.)

Clarke v Hart
This was an action of slander brought by Dr. Clarke against a tobacconist who carries on business in Mare street, Hackney.
Mr. Morton Smith was for the plaintiff; Mr. Rolland for the defendant.
The facts, as opened by counsel, were shortly that in November, 1888, when the Jack the Ripper scare was at its height, the defendant was acting as an amateur detective in Whitechapel. In consequence of his having made a communication to Scotland yard, the plaintiff was subjected to much annoyance. He was "shadowed" by detectives and his house was visited and searched by the police, it being suggested that a man who was suspected and being followed had entered it. On a letter being written the only answer was that the defendant was only discharging his duty as a citizen. Counsel went on to say that even now plaintiff was willing to accept an apology and his expenses.
At the suggestion of the learned Judge, counsel for the defendant consulted his client, and by consent a juror was withdrawn, the defendant expressing his regret that anything he had done had occasioned any pain to the plaintiff and agreeing to play plaintiff's costs.
Mr. Justice Stephen said that as to the notion that every man had a duty to detect crime his only duty was to sit still unless he actually knew something about it. The amateur detection of crime only led to much inconvenience to all parties concerned.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

David O'Flaherty
Chief Inspector
Username: Oberlin

Post Number: 770
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Monday, March 14, 2005 - 5:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hi Chris,

I've no idea how many Dr. Clarkes there were at that time, but there was a Dr. J. Clarke who was an assistant divisional surgeon for H Division, I think--he examined the Pinchin Street Torso. Times, 25 Sept 1889. It might not be the same fellow at all. It seems strange that detectives would shadow a divisional surgeon.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Natalie Severn
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Severn

Post Number: 1685
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Monday, March 14, 2005 - 6:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Very weird this tit- bit, Chris.Yet I suppose a fair bit of this went on and no doubt hampered the investigation.I think a good many odd balls went to the police station and claimed to be JtR or to know who he was etc
Thanks as always for posting this intriguing information.
Natalie
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nina Thomas
Inspector
Username: Nina

Post Number: 236
Registered: 5-2004
Posted on Monday, March 14, 2005 - 6:47 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hi Chris,

I have the following info on Dr. Clark.

Full name for J. Clark who was involved in the Alice MacKenzie and Pinchin Street Torso cases.
The Eastern Post & City Chronicle September 28, 1889
Mr. Percy John Clark, assistant to Dr. Phillips, surgeon to the H division of police

1881 Census 33 York Place, London, Middlesex, England
Head: Frederick Clark (age 44) born: Lambeth, Surrey, England (Contractor)
Wife: Susan Clark (age 40) born: St Pancras, Middlesex, England (Dressmaker)
Daughter: Mary Clark (age19) born: Ruckinge, Kent, England (Clerk Ship Broker)
Son: Percy Clark (age 17) born: Ruckinge, Kent, England (Scholar)
Mother (widowed): Jane Clark (age 61) born: Strand St Martins (Annuitant)
Dressmakers Servants:
Emily Conn (age 27)
Helen Huggins (age 27)
Florence Harpham (age 20)
Elizabeth Pike (age 16)
Domestic Servants:
Sarah King (age 26)
Fanny Anecobe (age 26)
Charles Smith (age15)

1901 Census limited search
Percy Clark (age 37) Medical Practioner
Born: Kent, Ruckinget
Administrative County: London
Civil Parish: Norton Folgate

Nina
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nina Thomas
Inspector
Username: Nina

Post Number: 237
Registered: 5-2004
Posted on Monday, March 14, 2005 - 7:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

The Dr. Clarke you are looking for most likely isn’t the one I listed as the spelling is wrong. Here is a list of surgeons and Medical Practitioners from the 1901 census (Administrative County London) it could be any one of them. If the doctor lived outside of London it’s a lost cause. The 1913 medical register lists 111 Dr. Clarkes.

Surgeons
Charles Clarke (age 39) Civil Parish: Plumstead
Foucaette Clarke (age 49) Civil Parish: St George Hanover Sq
George Clarke (age 62) Civil Parish: St Anne Soho
Heber Clarke (age 28) Civil Parish: Mile End Old Town
James Clarke (age 41) Civil Parish: St Marylebone
Thomas Clarke (age 48) Civil Parish: Battersea
William Clarke (age 27) Civil Parish: Hampstead
William Clarke (age 51) Civil Parish: St Marylebone
Medical Practitioners
Henry Clarke (age 28) Civil Parish: Lambeth
James Clarke (age 37) Civil Parish: St Anne Soho
Thomas Clarke (age 36) Civil Parish: Poplar
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jennifer D. Pegg
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Jdpegg

Post Number: 2029
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 4:27 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hi Chris,
you said the magic words shades of Lees!

Interesting
Cheers
Jenni
"Pick up the papers and take them to Tobermory!"


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert Charles Linford
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Robert

Post Number: 4237
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 4:37 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Coming at it the other way, the Hart in question seems to be James Carter Hart, born abt 1854 in Kent, and living at 293 Mare St Hackney in 1881 and 91. He gives his occupation as tobacconist and clerk to East India merchant in 81, but in 91 it looks like he's a civil engineer as well! And a parish secretary? Can anyone make this out?



Robert
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Ruffels
Inspector
Username: Johnr

Post Number: 355
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 5:06 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Chris, Robert & Natalie,
Without the Dr Clarke's first names and other details your difficulties in identifying are insurmountable.
Surely other London newspapers of the time would have covered the case (maybe even Law reports)?.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert Charles Linford
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Robert

Post Number: 4238
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 6:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

John, the case probably is mentioned somewhere else. Hart at least was a minor celebrity. There's stuff in the "Times" about James Hart and the London School Board, etc. This item from Oct 25th 1889 suggests it's the same man :




Robert
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Scott
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Chris

Post Number: 1772
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 9:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

What a lot of info - many thanks all of you!
I agree that Dr Clarke without more info is going to be very difficult to identify.
Many thanks for the identification on Hart- that is very useful. The descriptions of his occupations look very odd indeed. Tobacconist, clerk, parish secretary, civil engineer, member of a school board and amateur detective - did this guy ever sleep???
I will carry on looking for any info and Clarke as I would love to know the address which the police visited and searched.
Many thanks again to all
Chris

(Message edited by Chris on March 15, 2005)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Scott
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Chris

Post Number: 1773
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 10:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Here is the census information on Hart that I have found:
1871:
18 Shotts Road, Bermondsey
Head: James Hart aged 39 born Marylebone
Wife: Fanny Hart aged 37 born Sevenoaks, Kent
Son: James C Hart aged 17 born Sundridge, Kent - Commercial Clerk


1881:
293 Mare Street, St John, Hackney
Head: James Carter Hart born Sundridge, Kent - Tobacconist and Clerk to E. India Merchant.
Wife: Evlyon (?) C.M. Hart aged 30 born Guernsey
Son: Thomas Sidney Hart aged 1 born Hackney
Mother: Fanny Hart aged 49 born Sevenoaks, Kent - Coal agent's wife
Servant: Mary Cox aged 21 born Hackney


1891:
293 Mare Street, Hackney
Head: James C Hart aged 37 born Sundridge, Kent - Tobacconist, Parish Secretary, Civil Engineer
Wife: Rose A Hart aged 31 born Oxford
Children:
James S aged 11 born Hackney
Evylyn (male) aged 7 born Hackney
Dora M aged 11 months born Hackney
Servant: Fotunetta Donato aged 21 born Old Ford


1901:
27 Wellmeadow Road, Lewisham
Head: James C Hart aged 47 born Sundridge, Kent - Cigar merchant
Wife: Rosa A Hart aged 41 born Oxford
Children:
James S aged 21 born Hackney - Shipowner's clerk
Margaret F aged 6 born Hackney
Louisa G aged 2 born Hackney
Mother (widowed): Fanny Hart aged 69 born Sevenoaks, Kent.
Servant:
Edith E Hannant aged 28 born Bungay, Suffolk
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Scott
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Chris

Post Number: 1774
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 10:17 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

It looks as though Hart may not have been located at 293 Mare Street at the time of the murders, but at a different address in the same street. On 27 September 1887, there was a report in the Times concerning registrations for voters' lists. Ths report includes the following passage:

"James Hart, 165 Mare Street, was objected to on the ground that he did not live there, and that he was not on the Southern Division for his residence. Mr. Hart stated that he occupied the premises for his business, though he did not sleep there. The objection was disallowed but the name was 'starred' as he elected to vote for the Southern Division."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alex Chisholm
Police Constable
Username: Alex

Post Number: 5
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 3:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

There is an interesting interview with Phillips’ assistant, Dr. Percy Clark reproduced in Nick Connell & Stewart Evans’ “The Man Who Hunted Jack the Ripper,” pages 136 – 140, in which Clark expresses the opinion that one man was responsible for three murders.

Best Wishes
alex

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert Charles Linford
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Robert

Post Number: 4244
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Wednesday, March 16, 2005 - 9:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Looking at Nina's list, here's a couple more Dr Clarkes :

John Clarke age 67 in 1891 living St George Hanover Sq

John Henry Clarke age 38 in 1891 living Kensington.

I think "Foucaette" may be a mistranscription for "Fincastle".

Robert


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Phillips
Chief Inspector
Username: Cgp100

Post Number: 752
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Wednesday, March 16, 2005 - 9:46 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

If it's any help, these seem to be the relevant National Archives' references for Queen's Bench cases from 1890:

Affidavits: KB 1/314/1-315/2
Indictments: KB 12/163.

Chris Phillips



(Message edited by cgp100 on March 16, 2005)

(Message edited by cgp100 on March 16, 2005)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joan Taylor
Unregistered guest
Posted on Monday, March 14, 2005 - 5:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Lovely bit of focus Chris, well done. I look forward to your next round of significant help. You are an extremely worthwhile member of these boards .
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joan Taylor
Unregistered guest
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 9:57 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

See previous submission! Thanks Chris for your input.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stepan Poberowski
Unregistered guest
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 4:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

According to the Kelly's Trades' Directory, 1891:

Surgeons

George Mouat Keith Clarke, M.R.C.S., 23 Gerrard street
James F.-Howard Clarke, M.R.C.S., 45 Wardour street
Wm. Bruce Clarke, M.A., M.B., F.R.C.S., 46 Harley street

Physicians:

John Clarke, F.R.C.P., 42 Hertford street
John Henry Clarke, 34 Harrington road

Physician & surgeon:

Joseph John Clarke, 25 Osnaburgh street

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Register now! Administration

Use of these message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use. The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping. The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements. You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.